Combatting Australia’s anti-China rhetoric

Tokyo’s security apparatus must have followed with amazement that excellent series by Max Suich in the AFR of 16-18 May, revealing the anti-China antics of their Australian opposite numbers.

A elected member of Australia’s parliament driven out in disgrace for maintaining a relationship with suspected Chinese government agents?  In Japan a top faction leader in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and powerful party secretary general secretary, Nikai Toshihiro, was not only a consistent supporter of pro-China policies. It was taken for granted that Chinese and pro-China sources must have provided some of the funds needed to help maintain his faction. 

In Japan the idea that people should prosecuted for trying to propagate pro-China polices would not even pass the kabuki laugh test.  

Following the AFR series no doubt those sturdy guardians of Australia’s security would have been checking their files to find out how come they had not labelled Suich as a security risk earlier. After all, as editor in chief of the Fairfax Sydney papers from 1989-87 he could well have been a target for sinister Beijing subversion.

Maybe I can help them.  

I have known Max off and on since the 1970’s when we were both writing for Australian media out of Tokyo. His reputation then was much as it is today – a no-nonsense searcher after facts and scoops with little time for political isms. 

With the pingpong diplomacy and the opening of relations with China we were thrown together several times in China. I could see then how he had a genuine interest in China.  But he was no panda hugger, certainly not in those Cultural Revolution days. 

His interest in China seems to have led him to look closely at the mechanisms behind Canberra’s extraordinary about turn in policy to China, from seeming sympathy to outright loathing in just five years. The result is his excellent insight to Canberra’s anti-China policies. 

Points that stand out. 

1. Push back:  This U-turn came in response to our intelligence community identifying alarming Chinese objectives: they were aiming to corrupt and capture our politicians and political system and damage our defence relationship with the US, and displace the US in east Asia.

Comment:  I can show you a dozen Japanese magazines, both left and right wing, which call for Japan to drop its alliance with the US. Politicians like Nikaido with direct links to Beijing have status.

Japan has confidence it can handle relations with China. Australia seems scared of its own shadow. 

2. Calling out: Calling out Chinese bad behaviour would discourage Chinese activities and show Australia could not be silenced or intimidated and set an example of a free society to Chinese citizens.

Comment:   So the nation which bugged East Timor government offices just so it could gain a few extra percent of the funds due to the impoverished nation it had helped to impoverish can serve as a model of free society virtue? 

The nation with 50 years experience in Five Eyes sophisticated hacking and other cyber operations against every Asian nation, China especially, cries  unfair when it gets some its own medicine back? 

3. Out in Front:  by the denouncing of China’s activities we would influence the region and indeed the US to show a united front against China’s intimidation. Beijing would face being ganged up upon.

The idea that the region would be moved by Australia’s example to form a united anti-China front is pure childish fantasy.  The Singaporeans know more about China than our security experts would ever know (apart from anything else they can read Chinese).

Pro-China elements there are kept under control, some in prison. But Singapore’s policy to China is a model of balance and restraint leading to major business gains. Far from being invaded by Chinese investments, Singapore has been given its own industrial park in China, at Suzhou near Shanghai.

Canberra now seems determined to reject a harmless Chinese port investment in Darwin. If that project had gone ahead Australia could have gained a Darwin-Adelaide fast train connection with industrial investments at both ends.

South Australia’s former futile hopes for an industrial park financed from Japan might finally have found an answer with China. But by saying no! we keep our anti-China virture intact while helping Asia in the same self-defeating direction. 

Great victory for those sturdy guardians of our security. 

Over many years, both as a diplomat and academic working in Russia, China and Japan (and capable in those three languages), I have seen close up the ignorance and incompetence of these people. 

ASIO’S top expert on the Soviet Union once identified me as a KGB spy because I knew the Odessa hotel where I was staying was next to the local KGB headquarters. Said expert did not even know the KGB operates as a public organisation with a brass place spelling out KGB in front of its buildings. 

I could relate much more.  In Japan they send up ‘experts’ who do not even know Japanese properly. It is unlikely they do better with Chinese.

Until recently Foreign Affairs would keep the security people under control; they were seen, in Paul Keatings words, as the ’nutters.’ 

They suffered severe inferiority complexes – the ones who had failed to get into FA especially.  

But thanks to the China scare, US policy shifts,  large budgets and donations from the arms industry they have come from behind to dominate policy.  FA now follows meekly behind. The nutters are in charge of the scare factory.

There are reasons to dislike and even be wary of China.  Beijing plays favourites, ruthlessly.  

I am not a favourite. Despite years of trying to counter biassed attitudes to China – the blatant exaggeration of China’s alleged expanionism especially – I suspect I am still in their black-books.  My sin?    Using strong Chinese words to dissuade a Chinese agent from trying to arrest none other than Max Suich trying to photograph some Chinese children. 

When we got to the Foreign Ministry Max was welcomed.  I was put in a corner, despite having organised that pingpong push. 

But one learns to realise how and why we have those troubles with China. And how to cope with them. The Japanese are one example. The Mongolians even more so. With a  population of only three million and 2,800 miles of undefended  land frontier facing China directly they feel quite happy to operate an anti-China foreign policy despite having no alliances to back them up and a history of domination by pre-communist Chinese regimes.   

Better than others they realise both the inward looking nature of Chinese policies, and the Chinese belief handed down over the ages that a superior culture can conquer all. 

Some years back our hawks were telling us the North Vietnamese were ‘puppets’ of an expansionist China. On this basis we set out to kill a large number of the very same people we now rely on to defend us from more imaginary Chinese expansionism.

Is it not time we sent these people off on a long holiday?  Or better, back to school where they could learn some history and then gain some maturity.